Want to jump the ATM queues and withdraw cash immediately? STRIP!

A transwoman in Delhi took off her shirt in ‘frustration’ yesterday after standing in a long queue to an ATM for an endless period of time, since the Government of the country theatrically announced banning of the highest denomination of the currency one day, without proper planning of its after-effects. Moments later, a female police constable reaches the scene, makes her ‘cover up’, ‘takes her away’, and helps her to withdraw money from another ATM – before everyone else in line before her. *facepalm*

Yes, you read that right. There’s a lesson in there for all us women who have been sanding under the sun for three hours to withdraw Rs 2,500 daily – STRIP! (Sorry, men, your nipples aren’t powerful enough that one flash, and it will destroy the public order, for the police to personally escort you to the front of the queue.)

On a serious note, two problems here. First, I have a feminist issue with this. Why is taking off a shirt by someone considered ‘protest’ enough for police-interference? I believe it was not the protest, but the means of the ‘protest’ which got someone to alert the police. She did not harm any civilian life like the Jat protests in Haryana, she was not sitting on a dharna blocking the roads, she did not even go on a hunger strike with danger to her life. What, I believe, the moral custodians of Indian culture will say she did do, was ‘morally corrupt the society’. But hey, I am only guessing here.

The first and the last time I saw this happening in India was during the Manorama rape case in Manipur when the magnitude of the crime and its protest were ten-fold — so comparing the two is like comparing oranges to apples.

And is the only way to “maintain public order” is by letting that one person withdraw cash? She protested “against the shortage of money all over the country,” according to an FT report. How does this solve the issue? And what message is the police giving? It is making mockery of all the other people who are standing in line like civilians despite some dying during it.

So the police is essentially like that teacher or parent who gives the goodies to a spoiled kid, because he creates a scene – while the other kid wonders if he is too decent. And if life is fair.


8 thoughts on “Want to jump the ATM queues and withdraw cash immediately? STRIP!

  1. Lemme pen down my comments. You asked Why is taking off a shirt by someone considered ‘protest’ enough for police-interference?

    The answer is, because she was showing her sex organs. Madam, accept it or not, Breasts are Sex organs naturally. and If someone shows his or her sex organ, I think it is not accepted publicly, right ?,


    • I don’t see any public outcry, let alone police interference when men flash their penises while peeing by the roadside in busy marketplaces.

      Or is that not a ‘sex-organ’?
      Btw, your facial hair are also technically sex-organs. So, I don’t understand your point.


  2. My facial hair are not sex organs. It does not cause arousal in some one, but a penis or a boob does.

    And, if you do not see any public outcry, You don’t even see a public outcry when someone is brutally murdered on a Signal. Still murder is not good right ? ( if you agree, then it is sensible, if you say murder is fine, let it happen, then i am sorry, i am not discussing ) same way public did not outcry in this. #SameScenario..


    • People have had sexual fetishes for hair, feet – you name it.
      So it always without fail makes sense to ask people to control themselves than asking others to cover up.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s